Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: Le samedi 19 juin 2010 à 00:55 +0000, geremy condra a écrit : > geremy condra <debat...@gmail.com> added the comment: > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 6:05 AM, Antoine Pitrou <rep...@bugs.python.org> > wrote: > > > > Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > > > >> Great, I'm thinking more-or-less the API proposed in PEP 272- the > >> exception I'm thinking of is that 'strings' should be substituted for > >> 'bytes'- for AES and DES. It gets trickier when talking about public > >> key crypto, though. Perhaps something along the lines of > >> RSA.new(public_key=None, private_key=None,...), with the resulting > >> object supporting encrypt/decrypt/sign/verify operations? > > > > I don't have any opinion right now. I think a concrete proposal should > > be initiated and we can iterate from that. > > (that's assuming other people agree on the principle, of course) > > I assume that by "a concrete proposal" you're talking about code? Or > API docs? Also, what more needs to be done to ensure that other people > agree on the principle?
I was thinking about a PEP. Of course, you are free to reuse existing PEP content for that :) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8998> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
