Alexander Belopolsky <belopol...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:

> This, to me, implies that .fromstring should accept bytearray (though
> probably not general buffer objects). In 2.x, I understand .fromstring 
> to initialize an array from machine bytes read into a string, but not
> .fromunicode. This is *not* a text method, and the result may vary for 2
> and 4-byte unicode builds. So I can see that 3.x needs
>  .fromstring(bytes) but not .fromunicode(string).


No, fromunicode is still needed.  It is used to fill type 'u' array with 
unicode wide characters.  In 3.x unicode type was renamed to str and str to 
bytes, so fromunicode should become fromstring (or maybe fromstr to avoid 
confusion) and fromstring should become frombytes.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue8990>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to