R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com> added the comment: I just took a look at RFC 3339, and I see what you mean, Anatoly, about the meaning of -00:00. But reading further:
"While the Internet does have a tradition of accepting reality when creating specifications, this should not be done at the expense of interoperability. Since interpretation of an unqualified local time zone will fail in approximately 23/24 of the globe, the interoperability problems of unqualified local time are deemed unacceptable for the Internet." It seems to me that we should not try to produce an RFC 3339 compliant date string from a naive datetime. It will be practical to accept that restriction once issue 5094 is resolved. Given this, I'd be OK with Z being the default. ---------- dependencies: +datetime lacks concrete tzinfo impl. for UTC _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue7584> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
