STINNER Victor <victor.stin...@haypocalc.com> added the comment: > Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > > Would you prefer to not define the function instead of writing a pseudo- > > atomic function? > > Your current implementation is useless, since it doesn't achieve anything > new. Besides, if the function isn't atomic, don't name it atomic_XXX.
Someone may reimplement it with unlink+rename which is worse :-) But ok, you prefer to not define the function if no real atomic implementation can be written. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8828> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
