Matthias Klose <d...@debian.org> added the comment: Per, on 2010-03-17, I asked you via email:
"I was looking at http://bugs.python.org/issue5689 http://bugs.python.org/issue6715 and Martin's comments about the licensing of the bindings; is there a special reason for the lgpl3 license of the bindings, given that both python and xz-utils are not gpl'ed?" Does pyliblzma need to be licensed under the lgpl3? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue5689> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
