Daniel Black <dan...@cacert.org> added the comment: > msg106323 - Author: Antoine Pitrou (pitrou) Date: 2010-05-22 20:17
I quite like your proposed alternative here. Not sure when/if I'll get to implement this. > msg106324 - Author: Jean-Paul Calderone (exarkun) Date: 2010-05-22 22:17 Sorry I don't like this as much. I believe following the RFC for TLS SNI should be implicit and not something the programmer need to put effort into achieving. I acknowledge this approach does go against some explicit behaviour programming quality metrics. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue5639> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
