Raymond Hettinger <rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:

Am closing this.  It would make no sense to change simple, pure python code to 
support objects implementing only one of the rich comparison methods.  People 
implementing rich comparisons need to implement all six if they want to 
guarantee total ordering and to be usable by various modules that need to be 
able to make comparisons.

FWIW, the C code is not guaranteed to be exactly the same in terms of 
implementation details, only the published API should be the same.  And, for 
this module, a decision was made for the C code to support only lists 
eventhough the pure python version supports any sequence.

----------
status: open -> closed

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3051>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to