Martin v. Löwis <mar...@v.loewis.de> added the comment: I think it's important to note that this may err towards larger numbers (rather than being merely inaccurate).
I also find this "an upper bound on ratio()" difficult to understand. IIUC, it is the correct value being bounded, not the result of the function under discussion that is bounded (by the correct value). ---------- nosy: +loewis _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8686> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
