Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment: > FreeBSD's crypt(3) doesn't explain the 'salt' for Blowfish crypt exactly.
Reading: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=crypt&apropos=0&sektion=3&manpath=FreeBSD+7.2-RELEASE&format=html and especially the section entitled "Modular crypt", it looks like your salt should take the form "$2$salt$ignored", where there are at most 8 characters of salt and the 'ignored' bit is ignored. So your $2a$ looks wrong to me: shouldn't it be $2$? And after that, in the examples that you give, the only used portion of the salt is "05", which is the same in all the examples, so I'd expect to get the same output in each case. I can't see any way that Python could be contributing to this: if you look at the implementation (in Modules/cryptmodule.c), you'll see that the crypt function (called crypt_crypt in the source) really is a trivial wrapper around the system function; there's no pre- or post-processing of arguments. Can you attach the C code that's giving the different results? ---------- status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8596> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
