Jean-Paul Calderone <exar...@twistedmatrix.com> added the comment: Well, at the risk of stating the obvious, perhaps the dup() thing should be eliminated. The justification for it seems less than clear, and apparently it causes some problems.
That might be a direction to consider in the long term, though, rather than as a (different) immediate fix for this issue. ---------- nosy: +exarkun priority: high -> normal resolution: fixed -> stage: committed/rejected -> status: pending -> open type: behavior -> _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8524> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
