Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment: Tennessee, are you still tracking this issue? If not, can I steal it from you. :)
> I found out that timedelta % int is not supported in the > released versions while timedelta // int is. Mmm. Interesting. :) I think it would be fine to add timedelta % timedelta in this patch, and then open another feature request for timedelta % int and friends as you suggest. I don't think divmod(timedelta, timedelta) should go in if timedelta % timedelta doesn't also go in. > I feel that increasing the number of added > features will reduce the likelihood of patch being accepted. Perhaps; I haven't seen much opposition to these ideas anyway---I think the only reason they haven't been implemented yet is lack of round-tuits. I'd be +1 on accepting the current patch if timedelta % timedelta were added to it. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2706> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
