Yaniv Aknin <yaniv.ak...@gmail.com> added the comment: I've updated the sample code to run with Python 3 and tested on Ubuntu 9.10 with and without setting subprocess._has_poll = False.
As expected, when using poll() the sample runs correctly. When not using poll() the sample breaks (sometimes no data, sometimes some data; oddly, it seems the 'some data' variant appears only when I strace the process, probably because it slows things down). I suggest this be committed against 3.2 as well, but I don't know how these things are usually done; should I produce a separate patch which ports the latest patch currently posted in this thead against py3k? Or will this be done by whomever applies the patch? ---------- nosy: +Yaniv.Aknin versions: +Python 3.2 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue6457> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
