Jesús Cea Avión <j...@jcea.es> added the comment: Roumen Petrov (rpetrov) wrote: >> >> Jesús Cea Avión<j...@jcea.es> added the comment: >> >> I just did the minimal change. I don't know if removing >> "defined(HAVE_MAKEDEV)" is safe.
> The python build system is full with minimal changes and result is a > big mess. Did you found which revision add ".. defined(HAVE_MAKEDEV)" > in posix*.c ? The code was added in 2002-07-30 by nnorwitz, to support OSF1 (Dec Unix). Is that platform still supported?. I don't see any related buildbot. >> "HAVE_DEVICE_MACROS" is defined if "configure" finds "makedev()" macro. > And what is result on you platform ? It is defined if I add the new "include". > Cases: > 1) platform is no longer supported - it is save to remove test case from > configure and defined(HAVE_MAKEDEV) from posixmodule.c Do we have a list of officially supported?. > 2) HAVE_DEVICE_MACROS is defined for you . Then check how is written > test for HAVE_DEVICE_MACROS and make test for makedev similar. Investigating the issue, I could say that HAVE_MAKEDEV should be deleted, but I don't have access to a OSF1 machine for trying. How should I proceed? ---------- nosy: -barry, rpetrov _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3928> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
