Tom Loredo <lor...@astro.cornell.edu> added the comment: > Unless you vehemently disagree, I am not making this a release blocker for > 2.6.5.
I'm not sure who you are asking (I doubt it was me!), but I don't consider this a release blocker. The only possible substantive issue is whether "python" should run 32-bit or 64-bit Python after a universal framework install. Previously it ran 64-bit, but that was probably accidental. I don't have a strong opinion about this; others should weigh in appropriately. I think a change in behavior here would only negatively impact a very small number of users (those who built from source on OS X, and who built universal versions on a 64-bit platform, and who count on 64-bit default behavior). For example, they may have built 64-bit extensions that could appear broken after an update to 2.6.5 if they don't know they should use "python-64". In my opinion the main part of the "source" at issue here is not really source but the Mac/README file; but this is certainly not the only subtlety of Python-on-OS X that is not yet covered there! ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8089> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
