Vlastimil Brom <vlastimil.b...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Wow, that's what can be called rapid development :-), thanks very much!
I did'n noticed before, that \G had been implemented already.
\X works fine for me, it also maintains the input string indices correctly.
We can use unicode character properties \p{Letter} and unicode bloks
\p{inBasicLatin} properties;
the script properties like \p{Latin} or \p{IsLatin} return "undefined property
name".
I guess, this would require the access to the respective information in
unicodedata, where it isn't available now (there also seem to be much more
scripts than those mentioned at regular-expressions.info
cf.
http://www.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/Scripts.txt
http://www.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/PropertyValueAliases.txt (under "# Script
(sc)").
vbr
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2636>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
