anatoly techtonik <techto...@gmail.com> added the comment: I can't see changes to subprocess.call() docs in issue #6760. I reopen this bug, because call() definitely need a visible note about this significant behavior. I can not reopen #6760
http://docs.python.org/library/subprocess.html#convenience-functions ---------- assignee: -> georg.brandl components: +Documentation nosy: +georg.brandl status: closed -> open _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue7939> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
