Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: Well, the history on this looks a bit complicated and I don't really know the details, but witness the first sentences of the initial message in issue960406:
“This is a patch which will correct the issues some people have with python's handling of signal handling in threads. It allows any thread to initially catch the signal mark it as triggered, allowing the main thread to later process it. (This is actually just restoring access to the functionality that was in Python 2.1)” Apparently Python has been hesitating between both behaviours. > The Python documentation clearly states that > there is no user accessible Python functions that can modify > per-thread signal mask, so it is currently impossible to solve the > problem with just Python code. Well as I already said we could introduce this missing feature. Ideas and patches welcome. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1975> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
