Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment: Mike Cowlishaw has confirmed that the tests scbx164, scbx165 (in version 2.59 of the tests) are implementation-specific, so test_decimal is doing the right thing in skipping them. So I think this issue can be closed.
I don't think it's worth removing the restriction on the 2nd scaleb argument: while I still think it's arbitrary and unnecessary, keeping it allows us to say that we're in full compliance with the specification. ---------- resolution: -> fixed status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue7048> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
