Alexander Belopolsky <belopol...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Raymond Hettinger <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: .. > Martin has already rejected a similar proposal for similar reasons. > Please drop this one. Sure. In fact I've never proposed to apply this patch. As I said in my original submission, the only purpose of reviving issue1507011 is this way was to give an easy way for users who claimed that in their apps saving 4-8 bytes per interned string would make a difference to test their claim. Just as with issue1507011 three years ago I personally did not see noticeable improvements in my applications from the patch. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue7224> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
