Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment: I think this patch should be applied, on the basis that:
- the WITHOUT_COMPLEX macro doesn't appear to be documented, or linked to any existing configure option - there aren't enough developer and/or buildbot cycles to keep obscure options like this well tested and maintained - building py3k with -DWITHOUT_COMPLEX currently fails anyway - the complex type is (slightly) more tightly integrated in py3k than in trunk, thanks to PEP 3141: (-1)**0.5 produces a complex result in py3k; in trunk it gives ValueError. Any objections to getting rid of WITHOUT_COMPLEX? The patch itself looks fine to me. ---------- nosy: +mark.dickinson _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue7147> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
