Martin v. Löwis <mar...@v.loewis.de> added the comment: > I plan to look at this, and if it looks okay, commit it. Let me know if > anyone has any remaining issues.
I have the general issue that the semantics of the Windows symlink implementation are ill-defined. Specifically for the patch, I think precise documentation of the implemented behavior is is missing (unless it behaves like Unix symlink to the tiniest detail, which I doubt). Without an exact specification of what it should do it is difficult to tell whether it does that correctly. ---------- title: Add os.link() and os.symlink() and os.path.islink() support for Windows -> Add os.link() and os.symlink() and os.path.islink() support for Windows _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1578269> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
