R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com> added the comment: Your patch looks good. I was going to opine that mentioning __contains__ was good because it would lead the reader to understand how 'in' is supported, but since the len function is referenced but that doesn't let you learn about __len__, you might as well be consistent and talk about in and not __contains__. So I'd vote for changing the 3.x docs to match.
I agree with you about the example. ---------- nosy: +r.david.murray _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue6423> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
