Benjamin Peterson <benja...@python.org> added the comment: I have no idea either. It seems os.popen is now a hacked up to use subprocess, so it seems intentional to keep it. Guido, you made this change; is os.peopen supposed to be gone in 3.x?
---------- nosy: +gvanrossum _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue6490> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
