John O'Driscoll <biggerbu...@yahoo.co.in> added the comment: I'm aware of Boost without being familiar. I should find out more. I don't have any reason to think it might not be the better approach.
I guess when I wrote this I was thinking in terms of minimising dependencies: writing a program that depended only on the standard libraries of c/c++ and python. In that context, if Boost-python were to become a part of a stdlib, there'd be no need at all for this. Are there any plans afoot? Also, if dependencies are not a problem for your project, Boost might be the way to go. I won't indulge in any polemic one way or the other. I just thought a DIY primer might be useful in some contexts. Whether the official docs is the place for it I don't know. John O'Driscoll ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue6251> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
