Clay McClure <c...@daemons.net> added the comment: On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 2:18 AM, Martin v. Löwis <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>> I'd like to see the issues fixed upstream, and the library removed >> from Python until it is satisfactory to the developers who will >> actually use it. To my knowledge, every developer (outside of Google) >> who has commented on the issue has indicated a preference for a >> different API. > > That's not true - I'm outside of Google, and have not indicated such > a preference. You've indicated no preference either way, and have said: "I personally have no plans for using this library, or any other IP address library" I should think you would seek the opinion of those developers who actually do have plans to use an IP address library. As far as I can tell, every developer in that category, outside of Google, that has commented on this issue here or in python-dev has advocated a different API. Clay ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3959> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
