Martin v. Löwis <mar...@v.loewis.de> added the comment: > I am just wondering why we want to be quite different from how many > other languages are approaching the issue.
Because we have exceptions, and they don't. Would you also propose that open() should return None, just because fopen(3) returns NULL? While it may be debatable whether applications care about the error when passing "" as the locale, there is also the second case where applications pass an explicit locale setlocale(locale.LC_ALL, "de...@euro") When they do that, they surely want to be told if this actually worked. > Sure enough, we can use a > try: construct, but it kind of defeats the principle of least > astonishment by being different from the rest on this issue. There is also the backwards compatibility issue: your change will break existing code. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1443504> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
