Akira Kitada <akit...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Here's another patch which addsd iter to dbm and gdbm.
Note that dbm and gdbm C API is a little different.
gdbm_nextkey requires key for its argument, dbm_nextkey don't.
So I had to use for gdbm an static variable that points to the current
position.
Now iterator in gdbm and dbm works differently.
>>> import dbm
>>> d = dbm.open('foo', 'n')
>>> d['k1'] = 'v1';d['k2'] = 'v2';
>>> for i in d: print i; break
...
k1
>>> for i in d: print i
...
k2
>>> for i in d: print i
...
>>> import gdbm
>>> gd = gdbm.open('foo.gdbm', 'n')
>>> gd['k1'] = 'v1';gd['k2'] = 'v2';
>>> for i in gd: print i; break
...
k2
>>> for i in gd: print i
for i in gd: print i
...
k1
>>> for i in gd: print i
...
k2
k1
----------
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file13676/issue5736.diff
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5736>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
