apostofes <aivainjr...@gmail.com> added the comment:
plus I would want it to have some more methods,
```
l = [1, 2, 3]
```
using enhanced dir should give,
```
{'list': {'__add__', '__contains__', '__delitem__', '__eq__', '__ge__',
'__getattribute__', '__getitem__', '__gt__', '__iadd__', '__imul__',
'__init__', '__init_subclass__', '__iter__', '__le__', '__len__',
'__lt__', '__mul__', '__ne__', '__new__', '__repr__',
'__reversed__', '__rmul__', '__setitem__', '__sizeof__',
'__subclasshook__', 'append', 'clear', 'copy', 'count', 'extend',
'index', 'insert', 'pop', 'remove', 'reverse', 'sort'},
'object': {'__delattr__', '__dir__', '__format__', '__reduce__',
'__reduce_ex__', '__setattr__', '__str__'}}
```
obtained from, (here only printing, made a dictionary in the implementation in
the PR)
```
for j in dir(l):
print(f'l.{j}.__qualname__')
```
this check fails for,
```
{'list': {'__doc__', '__hash__', '__class__'}}
```
I would also want these,
```
{'list': {'__instancecheck__','__subclasscheck__', '__subclasses__', 'mro'},
'type': {'__call__', '__prepare__'}}
```
which were obtained from,
```
for j in set(dir(type(l))) - set(dir(l)):
print(f'l.{j}.__qualname__')
```
and it fails for,
```
{'list': {'__abstractmethods__', '__base__', '__bases__', '__basicsize__',
'__dict__', '__dictoffset__',
'__flags__', '__itemsize__', '__module__', '__mro__',
'__name__', '__qualname__', '__text_signature__',
'__weakrefoffset__'}
```
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue47254>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
