New submission from Марк Коренберг <socketp...@gmail.com>:
Using vfork in #35823 is VERY tricky. Please comment out vfork() usage for now. Yes, we can (should) use vfork(), but we have to rewrite the child code. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215813 I would say it's URGENT. ---------- components: Extension Modules messages: 416897 nosy: socketpair priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Subprocess with vfork() is broken versions: Python 3.10, Python 3.11 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue47245> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
