Andrew Svetlov <andrew.svet...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> The problem is more that a sleep is not a reliable synchronization primitive Yes, sure! I'm trying to avoid 'sleep for synchronization' when I'm writing new tests or fixing existing ones. The problem with this particular queue tests is: I rewrote old-styled tests that used a loop time shift generator with IsolatedAsyncioTestCase keeping the minimal invasive changes. It doesn't work well, now tiny shifts are removed; only 'await sleep(0)' are left when a bare context switch is needed without a delay. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue47076> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
