Erlend E. Aasland <erlend.aasl...@innova.no> added the comment:

Ah, one of my very first contributions, bpo-40318, comes back to haunt me:

In bpo-40318, we migrated from the old SQLite trace API (sqlite3_trace) to 
SQLite trace v2 API (sqlite3_trace_v2). GH-19581, which introduced this change, 
introduced a bug: the old trace API _implicitly_ expanded bound parameters; the 
new trace API does not. However, there was no tests for this behaviour, so the 
regression was unnoticed[^1].

So, this bpo is actually a bug fix; not a feature. It should be backported to 
3.10, which contains the regression.

I'm preparing a fix for GH-28240, and I'll prepare a 3.10 backport including 
both GH-2840 and its upcoming fix.


[^1]: There has been no bug reports regarding this change in behaviour, so it 
seems to have gone under most people's radar.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue45138>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to