Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> I'd modify the optimization to be that we continue to seek the smallest > denominator, but in the case that multiple numerators would give ratios > within the computed interval then we choose the numerator among these that > gives the ratio closest to the input value. Hmm. This is getting more DWIM-like (Do What I Mean) by the minute. :-) What about for an input of "0.001"? Your current specification would give 1/667, but I'm betting that you'd actually prefer 1/1000. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue46780> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
