Christian Heimes <li...@cheimes.de> added the comment:
Understood, thanks!
A trivial fix for the integer comparison bug would solve my issue:
--- a/Modules/signalmodule.c
+++ b/Modules/signalmodule.c
@@ -527,21 +527,20 @@ signal_signal_impl(PyObject *module, int signalnum,
PyObject *handler)
"signal number out of range");
return NULL;
}
- if (handler == modstate->ignore_handler) {
+ if (PyCallable_Check(handler)) {
+ func = signal_handler;
+ }
+ else if (PyObject_RichCompareBool(handler, modstate->ignore_handler,
Py_EQ) == 1) {
func = SIG_IGN;
}
- else if (handler == modstate->default_handler) {
+ else if (PyObject_RichCompareBool(handler, modstate->default_handler,
Py_EQ) == 1) {
func = SIG_DFL;
- }
- else if (!PyCallable_Check(handler)) {
+ } else {
_PyErr_SetString(tstate, PyExc_TypeError,
"signal handler must be signal.SIG_IGN, "
"signal.SIG_DFL, or a callable object");
return NULL;
}
- else {
- func = signal_handler;
- }
/* Check for pending signals before changing signal handler */
if (_PyErr_CheckSignalsTstate(tstate)) {
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue23325>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
