Terry J. Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> added the comment:
Sigh. You are right. I will close this tomorrow.
This also means that 'set()' is not guaranteed to return an empty built-in set.
I did think of this workaround for that:
>>> (empty:={None}).clear()
>>> empty
set()
Go ahead and propose something on python-ideas if you want, pointing out that
only displays (and comprehensions) are guaranteed to result in a builtin.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue46393>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
