Daniel Stutzbach <dan...@stutzbachenterprises.com> added the comment:
I agree with Raymond. In general, the collections module should define containers that are named after their function rather than their implementation. That way the implementation can be changed at a later date (or in other Python implementations) without causing confusion, and it makes it more obvious what use-case the new collection is solving. That's my opinion, anyway. As much as I'd love to see more container types in the collections module (my kingdom for a heap with .decrease_key()!), I don't see what use-case this implementation of red-black trees fills. ---------- nosy: +stutzbach _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1324770> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
