Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka+cpyt...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Such change would break a lot of existing interfaces. * addUnexpectedSuccess() has a single parameter. The change will add the second parameter and will break subclasses of TestResult. * addExpectedFailure() has two parameter. The change will add the third parameter and will break subclasses of TestResult. * unexpectedSuccesses is a list of tests. The change will make it a list of 2-tuples and will break users of TestResult. * expectedFailures is a list of 2-tuples. The change will make it a list of 3-tuples and will break users of TestResult. It is too destructive change. I think we can live without a message argument for expectedFailure(). ---------- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue12681> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
