Vinay Sajip <vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk> added the comment:
> This is the intended behaviour, and yes it's changed from previous versions > ... The previous value was incorrect, hence it was marked as an internal > field. But the value as it's calculated now seems to give a file that doesn't exist - how can that be correct? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue46028> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
