Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettin...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> it should have
>
> d.__get__(obj, type(obj)) instead of d.__get__(obj)
The objtype argument is optional as shown in all of the examples. The call
from object.__getattribute__() always passes in both parameters, even though
only the first is required.
################################################################
# Demonstration of __get__() being called with one or two params
class A:
def __init__(self, x):
self.x = x
def m(self, y):
return self.x * y
>>> a = A(10)
>>> a.m(5)
50
>>> vars(A)['m'].__get__(a)(5) # objtype is not required
50
>>> vars(A)['m'].__get__(a, A)(5) # objtype may be used
50
################################################################
# Demonstration of object.__getattribute__ supplying both args
class Desc:
def __get__(self, *args):
return args
class B:
z = Desc()
>>> b = B()
>>> b.z
(<__main__.B object at 0x109156110>, <class '__main__.B'>)
----------
resolution: -> not a bug
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31735>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
