Stephen Rosen <siros...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Probably >90% of the use-cases for chaining classmethod are a read-only class property. It's important enough that some tools (e.g. sphinx) even have special-cased support for classmethod(property(...)). Perhaps the general case of classmethod(descriptor(...)) should be treated separately from the common case? > I propose deprecating classmethod chaining. It has become clear that it > doesn't really do what people wanted and can't easily be made to work. If classmethod(property(f)) is going to be removed, can an implementation of classproperty be considered as a replacement? Or perhaps support via the other ordering, property(classmethod(f))? ---------- nosy: +sirosen2 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue45356> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
