Irit Katriel <iritkatr...@gmail.com> added the comment:

While I do think this module should be more customisable than it is, I think it 
should be done via support for subclassing rather than injecting functions that 
get forwarded on as you do here.

There are other issues on bpo related to customising this module, with more 
convincing use cases than suppressing errors. I think it’s more likely that a 
patch will be accepted which solves the general problem of this module being 
inflexible (while being backwards compatible).

The patch you propose here solves a small part of the problem while making the 
api clunkier and it commits us to supporting this new parameter when we try to 
solve the general problem.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue43656>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to