Zachary Ware <zachary.w...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Thanks for the report, Gabe! We actually ran into this in the opposite direction as well; a system with 3.1 but not 3.10 started up 3.1 for `py -3.10` causing unexpected syntax errors. The fix is now merged and will be available with the release of v3.10.1 and the next v3.11 alpha. ---------- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed versions: +Python 3.11 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue45616> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
