Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment: +1 on the idea.
I'm not sure I understand the patch, though. If the line: random_seed = int(1000000 * random.random()) produces a random_seed of 0 (or if randseed=0 is supplied as an option), it looks as though random.seed is never called; is this intentional? Also, not that it really matters, but why do you use the expression above instead of the simpler random.randrange(1000000)? ---------- nosy: +marketdickinson _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue5588> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
