Gregory P. Smith <g...@krypto.org> added the comment:
this is probably somewhat of an edge case. filesystems are presumably free to have their own concepts of granularity on size limit enforcement. zfs may become more popular in future ubuntu versions as they're offering it as a supported primary whole system filesystem. but zfs is also highly configurable so it likely isn't accurate to just say "zfs" caused this. that test appears to be setting RLIMIT_FSIZE to 1024 and creating a 1024 byte file. this could be an edge case, either in our understanding (the limit can never be reached or the limit can be exactly reached?) or in the filesystem's interpretation of that. my understanding is that it is supposed to be inclusive. RLIMIT_FSIZE 1024 should allow 1024 byte files. but for such small unrealistic real world values i can easily imagine filesystems being creative... people tend not to expect these limits to be so strict. that test could use refactoring to rely less on strict limits. that isn't what it was aiming to test. ---------- nosy: +gregory.p.smith status: pending -> open _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue31000> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
