Eric Snow <ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com> added the comment:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 8:38 AM Marc-Andre Lemburg <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > Yes, 3.10 is next, once I have 3.9 ironed out. And then I'll give 3.11 a try. Thanks! > Sorry, I wasn't clear. PGO is not a problem for test_embed. I just > wonder why the test_embed tests are run for creating the PGO profile > files. test_embed is far from being a regular work load for Python > applications. > > Well, I guess using the test suite for PGO is questionable anyway. > It's just that we don't have anything else handy to create those > profiles at Python build time :-) Ah, that makes sense. I expect we don't do anything more complex than run the whole suite. There have been discussions in the past about alternate workloads, but clearly nothing came of that. I suppose a comprehensive suite of high-level, (relatively) long-running benchmarks that cover the community's primary Python workloads would be ideal, but we don't have anything like that (yet). I suppose this is something we could discuss elsewhere. :) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue45395> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
