Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> added the comment:

We're not (yet) trying to optimize the code being executed (we should perhaps 
add an issue about class creation to https://github.com/faster-cpython/ideas).

I agree that marshal is very fast already; I doubt the extra cost of wordcode 
would pay off since it would increase the size. This could be tested but it 
would be a big experiment.

I'm not sure that compression will really help, since a typical decompressor 
delivers its output in some memory buffer. But this needs to be tested, and it 
might be a simpler experiment.

I'm pretty sure zipimport will improve things -- the main problem with it (as 
always) is that not all tooling understands it, since resource loading is 
different.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue45152>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to