Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> added the comment:
We're not (yet) trying to optimize the code being executed (we should perhaps add an issue about class creation to https://github.com/faster-cpython/ideas). I agree that marshal is very fast already; I doubt the extra cost of wordcode would pay off since it would increase the size. This could be tested but it would be a big experiment. I'm not sure that compression will really help, since a typical decompressor delivers its output in some memory buffer. But this needs to be tested, and it might be a simpler experiment. I'm pretty sure zipimport will improve things -- the main problem with it (as always) is that not all tooling understands it, since resource loading is different. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue45152> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com