Zachary Ware <zachary.w...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Note that this is suggesting to introduce a `.. source` directive, not adjust the existing `:source:` role. There's nothing preventing the use of the existing pattern in special cases, while using the new directive in the common cases. I don't have context for how much effort this would actually save translators (perhaps we could get representatives from various languages/workflows could chime in?) so it might not be worth it on other grounds, but I don't think this should be shot down just for "but sometimes" :) ---------- nosy: +zach.ware title: Docs: More surrounding text into the "source" directive -> Docs: add source directive for minor translation simplification type: -> enhancement _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue45139> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
