Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> added the comment:
Updating an existing (standards track) PEP significantly is not traditional. I recommend writing a new PEP. On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 01:24 Ken Jin <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Ken Jin <kenjin4...@gmail.com> added the comment: > > Guido, OP has kindly written a mini PEP for this. Do you think just > updating PEP 589 is sufficient, or do we need a full PEP? > > (PS. Changed version to 3.11 since we've missed the train for 3.10 > enhancements). > > ---------- > versions: -Python 3.10 > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> > <https://bugs.python.org/issue44863> > _______________________________________ > -- --Guido (mobile) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue44863> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
