New submission from Erlend E. Aasland <erlend.aasl...@innova.no>:
Quoting msg400205 by Petr in bpo-42064: I think the module could use a more comprehensive review for GIL handling, rather than doing it piecewise in individual PRs. I recommend that any function passed to SQLite (and only those) should - be named `*_callback`, for clarity - acquire the GIL at the very start - release the GIL at the very end ---------- assignee: erlendaasland components: Extension Modules messages: 400207 nosy: erlendaasland, petr.viktorin priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: [sqlite3] cleanup GIL handling type: enhancement _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue44991> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
