Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> added the comment:
That resolution makes sense to me as well. Should we make a note in the documentation for https://docs.python.org/3/library/types.html#types.MappingProxyType that the "read-only" protection is to guard against *accidental* modification, not against active attempts to subvert the protection? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue43838> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
