New submission from Ofek Kirzner <ofek...@gmail.com>:
Following https://bugs.python.org/issue32751 I think wait_for should also wait for running coroutine in case it has been cancelled. Example code: import asyncio async def inner(): try: print(1) await asyncio.sleep(3600) print(2) except asyncio.CancelledError: print('inner - canc') raise async def outer(f): try: print('a') # Version 1 - This creates the expected behaviour # await f # Version 2 - This creates the reversed behaviour await asyncio.wait_for(f, timeout=500) print('b') except asyncio.CancelledError: print('outer - canc') @pytest.mark.asyncio async def test_t1(): t = asyncio.create_task(outer(inner())) done, pending = await asyncio.wait([t], timeout=1) t.cancel() await t ------ I expect inner to be cancelled and awaited before outer is finished. i.e., exepcted output: 1 inner - canc outer - canc While I get: 1 outer - canc inner - canc ---------- components: asyncio messages: 395505 nosy: asvetlov, ofekkir, yselivanov priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: asyncio.wait_for does not cancel running tasks in the correct fashion type: behavior versions: Python 3.8 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue44371> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
